by Nahema ALLAILI | May 31, 2024 | Liquidated Damages, Penalty, Terms of Contract
RELEVANT CONTRACT PROVISIONS Clause 3.1. The Contractor hereby accepts the commitment to carry out the Works, in the time specified in the Agreement and the timetable attached hereto as Annexure 3, at his own risk, delivering the PV Project fully completed, started-up...
by Nahema ALLAILI | Apr 29, 2024 | Force majeure, Guarantee, Liquidated Damages, Penalty, Representation, Terms of Contract
RELEVANT CONTRACT PROVISIONS Clause 3.1. The Contractor hereby accepts the commitment to carry out the Works, in the time specified in the Agreement and the timetable attached hereto as Annexure 3, at his own risk, delivering the PV Project fully completed, started-up...
![RTS Flexible Systems Ltd v Molkerei Alois Muller GmbH & Co KG [2010]](https://www.lexengi.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Firefly-letter-of-intent-without-signature-9826-1080x675.png)
by Nahema ALLAILI | Aug 14, 2023 | Terms of Contract, Uncategorized, Uncategorized
Intention to create legal relations. Agreement subject to contract. Letter of intent setting out draft contract with standard terms to take effect when executed Letter of intent expiring with negotiations as to detailed terms continuing and work having commenced...
by Nahema ALLAILI | Aug 7, 2023 | Contract law, Terms of Contract, Uncategorized, Uncategorized
Smith V Hughes is a landmark case in English contract law that dealt with the issue of contract formation and the interpretation of contractual terms. Facts of the Case: The case involved a dispute between Mr. Smith, the plaintiff, and Mr. Hughes, the defendant. Mr....
by Nahema ALLAILI | Aug 1, 2023 | Contract law, Representation, Uncategorized, Uncategorized
Case Overview: The case of Bannerman v. White involved a contract for the sale of hops, where the buyer inquired if any sulfur had been used in their growth or treatment. The seller asserted that no sulfur had been used. However, after the hops were inspected,...
